Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to <i>Acyrthosiphon pisum</i> (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (<i>Lens Culinaris</i> M.)

Geteneh Mitku; Tebkew Damte; Mulatu Wakgari

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.)

Geteneh Mitku, Tebkew Damte, Mulatu Wakgari

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 1)

Received: 19 March 2019 Accepted: 26 April 2019 Published: 17 May 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) is an economically important insect pest of lentil in Ethiopia. The development of pea aphid resistant lentil genotypes with known resistance mechanism is an economical and effective way to manage this pest. Hence, the current study was conducted to determine the mechanisms (antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance) of resistance in six lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus.) genotypes to pea aphid. Three released varieties (Alemaya, Chalew, and R-186), three accessions (ILL-2595 and ILL-4422, and ILL-7664) and one susceptible accession were included in this study. A no-choice study was conducted to determine the categories of antibiosis and tolerance while free choice studies were conducted to determine antixenosis resistance mechanism. In the antibiosis test, there were significant differences in life table characteristics and demographic statistics among the resistant and susceptible lentil genotypes. ILL-7664 had high levels of an antibiotic effect than the others. Alemaya had high levels of tolerance to pea aphid. Choice studies indicated the presence of antixenosis resistance in the lentil genotype, Chalew, ILL-2595 and ILL-4422. The evaluated lentil genotypes exhibited different types of resistance mechanism and level of expression. Chalew showed a three mode of resistance, i.e., antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance. Further research should concentrate on levels of antibiosis, i.e., toxins and growth inhibitors to A. pisum.

Published in	Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15
Page(s)	27-35
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Antibiosis, Antixenosis, Lentil, Tolerance

References

[1]	Erskine, W., Tufail, M., Russell, A. Tyagi, MC., Rahman, MM. and Saxenal, MC. 1994. Current and future strategies in breeding lentil for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica, 73: 127- 135.
[2]	Tebkew Damte and Mekasha Chichaybelu. 2013. Evaluation of the insecticides- King 5EC and Lamdex 5 E. C for managing pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on lentil. Ethiopian journal of Crop Science, 3:105-115.
[3]	Mackay, P. A., Lamb R. J. and Smith M. A. H. 1993. Variability in life history traits of the aphid, A. pisum (Harris) from sexual and asexual populations. Oecol, 94: 330–338.
[4]	Blackman, R. L. and Eastop, V. F. 2000. Aphids on the World’s Crops: An Identification and Information Guide, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 466p.
[5]	Melaku Wale, Bekele Jembere and Emiru Seyoum. 2000. Biology of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cool-season food legumes. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 20:171-180.
[6]	Alemtaye Andarge and Van Der Westhuizen, M. C. 2004. Mechanisms of resistance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes to the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24 (3): 249-254.
[7]	Smith, C. M. 1989. Plant resistance Lo insects, a fundamental approach. John Wilcy and Sons. New York, 286.
[8]	Robinson, J. 1993. Conditioning host plant affects antixenosis and antibiosis to Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 86: 602-606.
[9]	Painter, R. H. 1951. Insect resistance in crop plants. Macmillan, New York, USA. 520p.
[10]	Dent, 0.2000. Insect Pest Management. CAB International. Wallingford, UK.
[11]	Panda, N., and S. G. Khush. 1995. Host plant resistance to insects. CABI, Wallingford, UK. 448 pp.
[12]	Kogan, M. 1975. Plant Resistance in Pest Management. In: Introduction to Insect Pest Management. ed. RL. Metcalf, and W. Luckmann. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[13]	DZARC (Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center).2012. Annual Report for 2000/20011, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 65p.
[14]	Kemal Ali., Louw, S. van den M. and Swart, WJ. 2005. Component and Mechanisms of Resistance in selected field pea lines to pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), Pest management Journal of Ethiopia, 9:17-27.
[15]	Webster J. A. and Innayatullah C. 1988. Assessment of experimental designs for green bug antixenosis test. Journal of Economic Entomology, 81:1246–1250.
[16]	Schweissing F. C. and Wilde G. 1979. Predisposition and non-preference of green bug for certain host cultivars. Environmental Entomology, 8:1070-1072.
[17]	Wyatt, I. J. and White, P. F. 1977. Simple estimation of intrinsic increase rates for aphids’ mites. Journal Applied Ecology, 14: 757-766.
[18]	DeLoach, C. J. 1974. Rate of increase of populations of cabbage, green peach, and turnip aphids at constant temperatures. Annals Entomological Society of America, 67: 332-340.
[19]	MSTAT-C 1990 User’s guide to MSTAT-C. A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
[20]	Baker, P. B., R. H. Ratcliffe, and A. L. Steinhauer. 1981. Tolerance to hairy chinch bug (Blissus leucopterus) feeding in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). Environmental Entomology, 10: 153-157.
[21]	Unger, L. M. and Quisenberry, S. S. 1997. Categorization of six wheat plant introduction lines for resistance to the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal Economic Entomology, 90: 1408-1413.
[22]	Tebkew Damte, Uiber, B. and Vidal, S. 2002. Biology and biotypes of two strain of pea aphid Acythosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) on lentil. Pest Management Journal Ethiopia, 6:13-21.
[23]	Wiktelius, S. and Pattersson, J. 1985. Simulation of bird cherry oat aphid population dynamics: A total for development strategies for breeding aphid-resistant plants. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment, 14:159-170.
[24]	Tingey, WM. 1981. CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture (pimental, D. ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Rorida, pp.175-197.
[25]	Edwards, O. R., Ridsdill-Smith, T. J. and Berlandier, F. A. 2003. Aphids do not avoid resistance in Australian lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) varieties. Bulletin Entomology Research, 93: 403-411.
[26]	Ruglie, P. and Gutierrez, A. P., 1995. "Use of life tables to assess host plant resistance in alfalfa to Therioaphis trifolii f. maculate (Homoptera: Aphididae): hypothesis for maintenance of resistance”. Environmental Ecology, 24: 313-325.
[27]	Francisco, L. R., Albano, G., Araceli, V., Maria C. L. and Carlos, B. 2017. Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha Maydis (Pass) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). American Journal of Entomology, 1 (1): 19-26.
[28]	Soroka J. J. and Mackay, P. A. 1991. Antibiosis and antixenosis to pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in cultivars of field peas. Journal Economic Entomology, 84: 1951-1956.
[29]	Kennedy, G. G., Gould, F., de Ponti, OMB and Stinner, RE. 1987. Ecological, agricultural, genetic and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm. Environmental Entomology, 16: 327-38.
[30]	Horber, E. 1972. Plant resistance to insects. Aerie Science Review, 10: 1-11.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Geteneh Mitku, Tebkew Damte, Mulatu Wakgari. (2019). Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Geteneh Mitku; Tebkew Damte; Mulatu Wakgari. Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). J. Plant Sci. 2019, 7(1), 27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Geteneh Mitku, Tebkew Damte, Mulatu Wakgari. Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). J Plant Sci. 2019;7(1):27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15,
  author = {Geteneh Mitku and Tebkew Damte and Mulatu Wakgari},
  title = {Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.)},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {27-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20190701.15},
  abstract = {The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) is an economically important insect pest of lentil in Ethiopia. The development of pea aphid resistant lentil genotypes with known resistance mechanism is an economical and effective way to manage this pest. Hence, the current study was conducted to determine the mechanisms (antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance) of resistance in six lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus.) genotypes to pea aphid. Three released varieties (Alemaya, Chalew, and R-186), three accessions (ILL-2595 and ILL-4422, and ILL-7664) and one susceptible accession were included in this study. A no-choice study was conducted to determine the categories of antibiosis and tolerance while free choice studies were conducted to determine antixenosis resistance mechanism. In the antibiosis test, there were significant differences in life table characteristics and demographic statistics among the resistant and susceptible lentil genotypes. ILL-7664 had high levels of an antibiotic effect than the others. Alemaya had high levels of tolerance to pea aphid. Choice studies indicated the presence of antixenosis resistance in the lentil genotype, Chalew, ILL-2595 and ILL-4422. The evaluated lentil genotypes exhibited different types of resistance mechanism and level of expression. Chalew showed a three mode of resistance, i.e., antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance. Further research should concentrate on levels of antibiosis, i.e., toxins and growth inhibitors to A. pisum.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.)
AU - Geteneh Mitku
AU - Tebkew Damte
AU - Mulatu Wakgari
Y1 - 2019/05/17
PY - 2019
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15
DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15
T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences
JF - Journal of Plant Sciences
JO - Journal of Plant Sciences
SP - 27
EP - 35
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2331-0731
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15
AB - The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) is an economically important insect pest of lentil in Ethiopia. The development of pea aphid resistant lentil genotypes with known resistance mechanism is an economical and effective way to manage this pest. Hence, the current study was conducted to determine the mechanisms (antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance) of resistance in six lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus.) genotypes to pea aphid. Three released varieties (Alemaya, Chalew, and R-186), three accessions (ILL-2595 and ILL-4422, and ILL-7664) and one susceptible accession were included in this study. A no-choice study was conducted to determine the categories of antibiosis and tolerance while free choice studies were conducted to determine antixenosis resistance mechanism. In the antibiosis test, there were significant differences in life table characteristics and demographic statistics among the resistant and susceptible lentil genotypes. ILL-7664 had high levels of an antibiotic effect than the others. Alemaya had high levels of tolerance to pea aphid. Choice studies indicated the presence of antixenosis resistance in the lentil genotype, Chalew, ILL-2595 and ILL-4422. The evaluated lentil genotypes exhibited different types of resistance mechanism and level of expression. Chalew showed a three mode of resistance, i.e., antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance. Further research should concentrate on levels of antibiosis, i.e., toxins and growth inhibitors to A. pisum.
VL - 7
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Geteneh Mitku

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Zeit Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
Tebkew Damte

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Zeit Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
Mulatu Wakgari

School of Plant Science, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Geteneh Mitku, Tebkew Damte, Mulatu Wakgari. (2019). Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Geteneh Mitku; Tebkew Damte; Mulatu Wakgari. Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). J. Plant Sci. 2019, 7(1), 27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Geteneh Mitku, Tebkew Damte, Mulatu Wakgari. Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.). J Plant Sci. 2019;7(1):27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15,
  author = {Geteneh Mitku and Tebkew Damte and Mulatu Wakgari},
  title = {Category of Resistance, Antixenosis, Antibiosis, and Tolerance to Acyrthosiphon pisum (H.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Selected Lentil Genotypes (Lens Culinaris M.)},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {27-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190701.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20190701.15},
  abstract = {The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) is an economically important insect pest of lentil in Ethiopia. The development of pea aphid resistant lentil genotypes with known resistance mechanism is an economical and effective way to manage this pest. Hence, the current study was conducted to determine the mechanisms (antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance) of resistance in six lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus.) genotypes to pea aphid. Three released varieties (Alemaya, Chalew, and R-186), three accessions (ILL-2595 and ILL-4422, and ILL-7664) and one susceptible accession were included in this study. A no-choice study was conducted to determine the categories of antibiosis and tolerance while free choice studies were conducted to determine antixenosis resistance mechanism. In the antibiosis test, there were significant differences in life table characteristics and demographic statistics among the resistant and susceptible lentil genotypes. ILL-7664 had high levels of an antibiotic effect than the others. Alemaya had high levels of tolerance to pea aphid. Choice studies indicated the presence of antixenosis resistance in the lentil genotype, Chalew, ILL-2595 and ILL-4422. The evaluated lentil genotypes exhibited different types of resistance mechanism and level of expression. Chalew showed a three mode of resistance, i.e., antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance. Further research should concentrate on levels of antibiosis, i.e., toxins and growth inhibitors to A. pisum.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download