Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in diabetic patients in general, but more so in patients who are not well balanced. The objective of our study was to identify the germs responsible for urinary tract infection and to study their sensitivity to the antibiotics used. Method: This was a retrospective and descriptive study of 212 diabetic patients followed at the Hospital du Cinquantenaire in Kinshasa from January 2019 to December 2021. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection was retained in the presence of positive bacteriuria, i.e. bacteriuria of the jet medium ≥ 105 cfu/ml in women and ≥ 104 cfu/ml in men or bacteriuria of urine collected in an indwelling catheter ≥ 102 cfu/ml. Results: Of the 800 diabetics received, 320 had performed a UEC and of these 212 were positive. The mean age of the patients included in our work was 43.1 ± 12.7 years with extremes of 18 and 77 years. The female sex was more represented (58.4%), i.e. a sex ratio of 01.3. Escherichia coli were the most frequent germ in 36.3% of cases, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae in 28.8%. The resistance rate was 40% for ampicillin, 60% for amoxicillin, 80% for oxacillin, 71.8% for ceftriaxone and 12.5% for imipenem. As for quinolones, the resistance rate was 82.6% for norfloxacin and 74.1% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance to gentamicin was 66.7%. Resistance rates for cotrimoxazole were 77.8% and 25.9% for nitrofurantoin. Conclusion: Urinary tract infection is a frequent pathology in diabetics. The most isolated germ is Escherichia coli. The rate of bacterial resistance was very high and varied from one study to another.
Published in | European Journal of Preventive Medicine (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11 |
Page(s) | 84-87 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Diabetes, Urinary Tract Infection, Escherichia Coli
[1] | Bonkoungou P, Lankoandé M, Guira O, Saloukou KE, kaboré RA, Zinsou A et al. Complications aiguës métaboliques du diabète sucré dans le Service de Réanimation Polyvalente du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo de Ouagadougou au Burkina Faso. Revue Africaine et Malgache de Recherche Scientifique/Sciences de la Santé. 2017; 5 (1): 36-41. |
[2] | Bickler SW, Wang A, Amin S, et al. Urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa: declining rates of chronic and recurrent infection and their possible role in the origins of non-communicable diseases. World J Surg 2018; 42: 1617–28. |
[3] | Goryakin Y, Rocco L, Suhrcke M. The contribution of urbanization to non-communicable diseases: evidence from 173 countries from 1980 to 2008. Econ Hum Biol 2017; 26: 151–63. |
[4] | Khorrami Z, Etemad K, Yarahmadi S, et al. Urbanization and noncommunicable disease (Ncd) risk factors: who stepwise Iranian ncd risk factors surveillance in 2011. East Mediterr Health J 2017; 23: 469–79. |
[5] | Fu AZ, Iglay K, Qiu Y, Engel S, Shankar R, Brodovicz K. Risk characterisation for urinary tract infections in subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2014; 28 (6): 805–10. |
[6] | Gupta K, Sahm DF, Mayfield D, Stamm WE. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause community acquired urinary tract infections in women: a nationwide analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33 (1): 89–94. |
[7] | Sridhar CB, Anjana S, Mathew JT. Acute Infections. In: Ahuja MMS, Tripathy BB, Sam Moses GP, Chandalia HB, Das AK, Rao PV, editors. RSSDI Text Book of Diabetes Mellitus. Hyderabad, India. 2002; chap. 34. p. 471–478. |
[8] | Geerlings SE, Stolk RP, Camps MJ, et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria can be considered a diabetic complication in women with diabetes mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000; 485: 309–14. |
[9] | Fünfstück R, Nicolle LE, Hanefeld M, Naber KG. Urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Nephrol. 2012; 77 (1): 40–8. |
[10] | Truzzi JC, Almeida FM, Nunes EC, Sadi MV. Residual urinary volume and urinary tract infection—when are they linked? J Urol. 2008; 180 (1): 182–5. |
[11] | Nitzan O. Urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus : review of prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther 2015; 5: 129–36. |
[12] | Hirji I, Guo Z, Andersson SW, Hammar N, Gomez-Caminero A. Incidence of urinary tract infection among patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD). J Diabetes Complicat. 2012; 26 (6): 513–6. |
[13] | Nichols GA, Brodovicz KG, Kimes TM, Déruaz-Luyet A, Bartels DB. Prevalence and incidence of urinary tract and genital infections among patients with and without type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017; 31 (11): 1587–91. |
[14] | Gninkoun J, Adébayo A, Yempabou S, Djrolo F. journal resistance bacterienne au cours des infections urinaires chez les patients diabetiques au cnhu-hkm de cotonou, benin. de la Société de Biologie Clinique du Bénin, 2018; N° 029; 99-103. |
[15] | Bonadio M, Costarelli S, Morelli G, Tartaglia T. The influence of diabetes mellitus on the spectrum of uropathogens and the antimicrobial resistance in elderly adult patients with urinary tract infection. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6: 54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-54. |
[16] | Hoepelman AI, Meiland R, Geerlings SE. Pathogenesis and management of bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 22 (Suppl): S35-S43. |
[17] | Boyko EJ, Fihn SD, Scholes D, Abraham L, Monsey B. Risk of urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria among diabetic and nondiabetic postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 161 (6): 557–64. |
[18] | Janifer J, Geethalakshmi S, Satyavani K, Viswanathan V (2009) Prevalence of Lower Urinary Tract Infection in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects in South India. Indian J Nephrol 19: 107-111. |
[19] | Assefa, A; Asrat, D; Woldeamanuel, Y; G/Hiwot, Y; Abdella, A; Melesse T. Bacterial profile and drug susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 2008; 46: 227–35. |
[20] | Abejew, Asrat Agalu; Denboba, Ayele A; Mekonnen AG. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of urinary tract bacterial infections in Dessie area,. Res Notes 2014; 7: 687: 1–7. |
[21] | Gangoue-Piéboji J, Koulla-Shiro S, Ngassam P, Adiogo D, Ndumbe P. Antimicrobial activity against gram negative bacilli from Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon. African Health Sciences. 2006 Dec; 6 (4): 232–5. |
APA Style
Umba Nguanga Charlotte, Blaise Makoso Nimi, Gedeon Longo Longo, Benjamin Mbenza Longo. (2022). Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiogram in Diabetic Patients Followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. European Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(4), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11
ACS Style
Umba Nguanga Charlotte; Blaise Makoso Nimi; Gedeon Longo Longo; Benjamin Mbenza Longo. Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiogram in Diabetic Patients Followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Eur. J. Prev. Med. 2022, 10(4), 84-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11
AMA Style
Umba Nguanga Charlotte, Blaise Makoso Nimi, Gedeon Longo Longo, Benjamin Mbenza Longo. Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiogram in Diabetic Patients Followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Eur J Prev Med. 2022;10(4):84-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11
@article{10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11, author = {Umba Nguanga Charlotte and Blaise Makoso Nimi and Gedeon Longo Longo and Benjamin Mbenza Longo}, title = {Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiogram in Diabetic Patients Followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo}, journal = {European Journal of Preventive Medicine}, volume = {10}, number = {4}, pages = {84-87}, doi = {10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejpm.20221004.11}, abstract = {Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in diabetic patients in general, but more so in patients who are not well balanced. The objective of our study was to identify the germs responsible for urinary tract infection and to study their sensitivity to the antibiotics used. Method: This was a retrospective and descriptive study of 212 diabetic patients followed at the Hospital du Cinquantenaire in Kinshasa from January 2019 to December 2021. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection was retained in the presence of positive bacteriuria, i.e. bacteriuria of the jet medium ≥ 105 cfu/ml in women and ≥ 104 cfu/ml in men or bacteriuria of urine collected in an indwelling catheter ≥ 102 cfu/ml. Results: Of the 800 diabetics received, 320 had performed a UEC and of these 212 were positive. The mean age of the patients included in our work was 43.1 ± 12.7 years with extremes of 18 and 77 years. The female sex was more represented (58.4%), i.e. a sex ratio of 01.3. Escherichia coli were the most frequent germ in 36.3% of cases, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae in 28.8%. The resistance rate was 40% for ampicillin, 60% for amoxicillin, 80% for oxacillin, 71.8% for ceftriaxone and 12.5% for imipenem. As for quinolones, the resistance rate was 82.6% for norfloxacin and 74.1% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance to gentamicin was 66.7%. Resistance rates for cotrimoxazole were 77.8% and 25.9% for nitrofurantoin. Conclusion: Urinary tract infection is a frequent pathology in diabetics. The most isolated germ is Escherichia coli. The rate of bacterial resistance was very high and varied from one study to another.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiogram in Diabetic Patients Followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo AU - Umba Nguanga Charlotte AU - Blaise Makoso Nimi AU - Gedeon Longo Longo AU - Benjamin Mbenza Longo Y1 - 2022/08/05 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11 T2 - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JF - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JO - European Journal of Preventive Medicine SP - 84 EP - 87 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8230 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20221004.11 AB - Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in diabetic patients in general, but more so in patients who are not well balanced. The objective of our study was to identify the germs responsible for urinary tract infection and to study their sensitivity to the antibiotics used. Method: This was a retrospective and descriptive study of 212 diabetic patients followed at the Hospital du Cinquantenaire in Kinshasa from January 2019 to December 2021. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection was retained in the presence of positive bacteriuria, i.e. bacteriuria of the jet medium ≥ 105 cfu/ml in women and ≥ 104 cfu/ml in men or bacteriuria of urine collected in an indwelling catheter ≥ 102 cfu/ml. Results: Of the 800 diabetics received, 320 had performed a UEC and of these 212 were positive. The mean age of the patients included in our work was 43.1 ± 12.7 years with extremes of 18 and 77 years. The female sex was more represented (58.4%), i.e. a sex ratio of 01.3. Escherichia coli were the most frequent germ in 36.3% of cases, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae in 28.8%. The resistance rate was 40% for ampicillin, 60% for amoxicillin, 80% for oxacillin, 71.8% for ceftriaxone and 12.5% for imipenem. As for quinolones, the resistance rate was 82.6% for norfloxacin and 74.1% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance to gentamicin was 66.7%. Resistance rates for cotrimoxazole were 77.8% and 25.9% for nitrofurantoin. Conclusion: Urinary tract infection is a frequent pathology in diabetics. The most isolated germ is Escherichia coli. The rate of bacterial resistance was very high and varied from one study to another. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -